The Conservation Reserve Program: Economic Implications for Rural America
- by Shawn Bucholtz, Patrick Sullivan, Daniel Hellerstein, LeRoy Hansen, Robert Johansson, Steven Koenig, Ruben N. Lubowski, William D. McBride, David McGranahan, Stephen Vogel and Michael Roberts
- 10/8/2004
Overview
This report estimates the impact that high levels of enrollment in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) have had on economic trends in rural counties since the program's inception in 1985 until today. The results of a growth model and quasi-experimental control group analysis indicate no discernible impact by the CRP on aggregate county population trends. Aggregate employment growth may have slowed in some high-CRP counties, but only temporarily. High levels of CRP enrollment appear to have affected farm-related businesses over the long run, but growth in the number of other nonfarm businesses moderated CRP's impact on total employment. If CRP contracts had ended in 2001, simulation models suggest that roughly 51 percent of CRP land would have returned to crop production, and that spending on outdoor recreation would decrease by as much as $300 million per year in rural areas. The resulting impacts on employment and income vary widely among regions having similar CRP enrollments, depending upon local economic conditions.
Download
-
Entire report
Download PDF -
Report summary
Download PDF -
Abstract, Acknowledgments, Contents, and Summary
Download PDF -
Introduction
Download PDF -
Rural Economic Trends Following CRP?s Implementation
Download PDF -
Land-Use and Economic Implications of Expiring CRP Contracts
Download PDF -
Conclusions
Download PDF -
References
Download PDF -
Appendix A: Modeling Rural County Socioeconomic Change
Download PDF -
Appendix B: Predicting Land-Use Changes
Download PDF -
Appendix C: Description of the Recreation Models
Download PDF -
Appendix D: U.S. Regional Agricultural Sector Model
Download PDF -
Appendix E: The Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Multiplier Framework
Download PDF